2013雅思考试:雅思模拟试题(3)

2013-03-21 10:49:04 雅思考试雅思模拟试题

  READING PASSAGE 3

  You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on Questions 26-39 which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.

  THE ORIGINS OF INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES

  The traditional view of the spread of the Indo-European languages holds that an Ur-language, ancestor to all the others, was spoken by nomadic horsemen who lived in what is now western Russia north of the Black Sea near the beginning of the Bronze Age. As these mounted warriors roamed over greater and greater expanses, they conquered the indigenous peoples and imposed their own proto-Indo-European language, which in the course of succeeding centuries evolved in local areas into the European languages we know today. In recent years, however, many scholars, particularly archaeologists, have become dissatisfied with the traditional explanation.

  The starting point of the problem of the origins of Indo-European is not archaeological but linguistic. When linguists look at the languages of Europe, they quickly perceive that these languages are related. The connections can be seen in vocabulary, grammar and phonology (rules for pronunciation). To illustrate the numbers from one to ten in several Indo-European languages. Such a comparison makes it clear that there are significant similarities among many European languages and also Sanskrit, the language of the earliest literary texts of India, but that languages such as Chinese or Japanese are not members of the same family (see figure 1).

  ENGLISH OLD GERMAN LATIN GREEK SANSKRIT JAPANESE

  ONE

  TWO

  THREE

  FOUR

  FIVE

  SIX

  SEVEN

  EIGHT

  NINE

  TEN AINS

  TWAI

  THRIJA

  FIDWOR

  FIMF

  SAIHS

  SIBUM

  AHTAU

  NIUN

  TAIHUM UNUS

  DUO

  TRES

  QUATTOUR

  QUINQUE

  SEX

  SEPTEM

  OCTO

  NOVEM

  DECEM HEIS

  DUO

  TREIS

  TETTARES

  PENTE

  HEKS

  HEPTA

  OKTO

  ENNEA

  DEKA EKAS

  DVA

  TRYAS

  CATVARAS

  PANCA

  SAT

  SAPTA

  ASTA

  NAVA

  DASA HITOTSU

  FUTATSU

  MITTSU

  YOTTSU

  ITSUTSU

  MUTTSU

  NANATSU

  YATTSU

  KOKONOTSU

  TO

  FIGURE 1 Words for numbers from one to ten show the relations among Indo-European languages and the anomalous character of Japanese, which is not part of that family. Such similarities stimulated interest in the origins of Indo-European languages.

  The Romance languages served as the first model for answering the question. Even to someone with no knowledge of Latin, the profound similarities among Romance languages would have made it natural to suggest that they were derived from a common ancestor. On the assumption that the shared characteristics of these languages came from the common progenitor (whereas the divergences arose later. as the languages diverged),it would have been possible to reconstruct many of the characteristics of the original proto-language. In much the same way it became clear that the branches of the Indo-European family could be studied and a hypothetical family tree constructed, reading back to a common ancestor roto-Indo-European.

  This is the tree approach. The basic process represented by the tree model is one of divergence: when languages become isolated from one other, they differ increasingly, and dialects gradually differentiate until they become separate languages.

  Divergence is by no means the only possible tendency in language evolution. Johannes Schmidt, introduced a "wave" model in which linguistic changes spared like waves, leading ultimately to convergence; that is, growing similarity among languages that were initially quite different.

  Today, however, most linguists think primarily in terms of linguistic family trees. It is necessary to construct some explicit models of how language change might occur according to a process-based view. There are four main classes of models.

  The first is the process of initial colonization, by which an uninhabited territory becomes populated; its language naturally becomes that of the colonizers. Second are processes of divergence, such as the linguistic divergence arising form separation or isolation mentioned above in relation to early models of the Indo-European languages. The third group of models is based on processes of linguistic convergence. The wave model, formulated by Schmidt in the 1870's, is an example, but convergence methods have not generally found favour among linguists.

  Now, the slow and rather static operation of these processes is complicated by another factor: linguistic replacement. That factor provides the basis for a fourth class of models. In many areas of the world the languages initially spoken by the indigenous people have come to be replaced, fully or partially, by languages spoken by people coming from outside. Were it not for this large complicating factor, the world's linguistic history could be faithfully described by the initial distribution of Homo Sapiens, followed by the gradual, ling-term workings of divergence and convergence. So linguistic replacement also has a key role to play in explaining the origins of the Indo-European languages.

  Questions 26-32

  Below is a summary of part of Reading Passage 3,"The Origins of Indo-European Languages".

  Read the summary and then select the best word or phrase from the box below to fill each gap. according to the information in the Reading Passage. Write the corresponding letters (A-L) in boxes 26-32 on your answer sheet.

  N.B. There are more words and phrases than you will need to fill the gaps. You may use a word or phrase more than once if you wish.

  Summary-Models of Language Change

  Answer

  Example There are four main models of language …… (Ex) …… K

  The first is the process of initial colonization where an uninhabited territory becomes populated: the language spoken will therefore be that of the ……(26)……

  Processes of ……(27)…… occur where different dialects, and then languages, develop from a common ……(28)…… Many of the original characteristics of this common ancestor can be reconstructed from what we know of the present separate ……(29)……

  Processes of linguistic ……(30)…… occur when languages which were initially different become more similar through contact. The wave model, formulated by Schmidt in the 1870s, is an example.

  The final model is that of linguistic ……(31)…… In this model, a new language replaces the language spoken by the ……(32)……

  A colonizers G languages

  B invaders H waves

  C proto-language I replacement

  D indigenous people J convergence

  E linguists K development

  F model L divergence

分享
qqQQ
qzoneQQ空间
weibo微博
《2013雅思考试:雅思模拟试题(3).doc》
将本文的Word文档下载,方便收藏和打印
下载文档

热门关注

2021年6月5日雅思考试真题答案

雅思考试答案

2021年6月5日雅思口语考试真题及参考答案

雅思口语考试

2021年6月5日阅读考试真题及答案

雅思阅读考试

2021年6月5日雅思写作考试真题及范文

雅思写作考试

2021年6月5日雅思考试听力部分答案

雅思听力考试

2021年3月4日雅思考试真题答案

考试真题答案

2021年3月13日雅思考试真题答案

考试真题答案

2021年3月27日雅思考试真题答案

考试真题答案

2020年1月4日雅思考试预测

雅思考试

2021年4月雅思考试写作真题答案

雅思写作考试

热门问答

付费下载
付费后无需验证码即可下载
限时特价:4.99元/篇 原价10元
微信支付

免费下载仅需3秒

1、微信搜索“月亮说故事点击复制

2、进入公众号免费获取验证码

3、输入验证码确认 即可复制

4、已关注用户回复“复制”即可获取验证码

微信支付中,请勿关闭窗口
微信支付中,请勿关闭窗口
×
温馨提示
支付成功,请下载文档
咨询客服
×
常见问题
  • 1、支付成功后,为何无法下载文档?
    付费后下载不了,请核对下微信账单信息,确保付费成功;已付费成功了还是下载不了,有可能是浏览器兼容性问题。
  • 2、付费后能否更换浏览器或者清理浏览器缓存后下载?
    更换浏览器或者清理浏览器缓存会导致下载不成功,请不要更换浏览器和清理浏览器缓存。
  • 3、如何联系客服?
    如已按照上面所说方法进行操作,还是无法复制文章,请及时联系客服解决。客服微信:ADlx86
    添加时请备注“文档下载”,客服在线时间为周一至周五9:00-12:30 14:00-18:30 周六9:00-12:30

  READING PASSAGE 3

  You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on Questions 26-39 which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.

  THE ORIGINS OF INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES

  The traditional view of the spread of the Indo-European languages holds that an Ur-language, ancestor to all the others, was spoken by nomadic horsemen who lived in what is now western Russia north of the Black Sea near the beginning of the Bronze Age. As these mounted warriors roamed over greater and greater expanses, they conquered the indigenous peoples and imposed their own proto-Indo-European language, which in the course of succeeding centuries evolved in local areas into the European languages we know today. In recent years, however, many scholars, particularly archaeologists, have become dissatisfied with the traditional explanation.

  The starting point of the problem of the origins of Indo-European is not archaeological but linguistic. When linguists look at the languages of Europe, they quickly perceive that these languages are related. The connections can be seen in vocabulary, grammar and phonology (rules for pronunciation). To illustrate the numbers from one to ten in several Indo-European languages. Such a comparison makes it clear that there are significant similarities among many European languages and also Sanskrit, the language of the earliest literary texts of India, but that languages such as Chinese or Japanese are not members of the same family (see figure 1).

  ENGLISH OLD GERMAN LATIN GREEK SANSKRIT JAPANESE

  ONE

  TWO

  THREE

  FOUR

  FIVE

  SIX

  SEVEN

  EIGHT

  NINE

  TEN AINS

  TWAI

  THRIJA

  FIDWOR

  FIMF

  SAIHS

  SIBUM

  AHTAU

  NIUN

  TAIHUM UNUS

  DUO

  TRES

  QUATTOUR

  QUINQUE

  SEX

  SEPTEM

  OCTO

  NOVEM

  DECEM HEIS

  DUO

  TREIS

  TETTARES

  PENTE

  HEKS

  HEPTA

  OKTO

  ENNEA

  DEKA EKAS

  DVA

  TRYAS

  CATVARAS

  PANCA

  SAT

  SAPTA

  ASTA

  NAVA

  DASA HITOTSU

  FUTATSU

  MITTSU

  YOTTSU

  ITSUTSU

  MUTTSU

  NANATSU

  YATTSU

  KOKONOTSU

  TO

  FIGURE 1 Words for numbers from one to ten show the relations among Indo-European languages and the anomalous character of Japanese, which is not part of that family. Such similarities stimulated interest in the origins of Indo-European languages.

  The Romance languages served as the first model for answering the question. Even to someone with no knowledge of Latin, the profound similarities among Romance languages would have made it natural to suggest that they were derived from a common ancestor. On the assumption that the shared characteristics of these languages came from the common progenitor (whereas the divergences arose later. as the languages diverged),it would have been possible to reconstruct many of the characteristics of the original proto-language. In much the same way it became clear that the branches of the Indo-European family could be studied and a hypothetical family tree constructed, reading back to a common ancestor roto-Indo-European.

  This is the tree approach. The basic process represented by the tree model is one of divergence: when languages become isolated from one other, they differ increasingly, and dialects gradually differentiate until they become separate languages.

  Divergence is by no means the only possible tendency in language evolution. Johannes Schmidt, introduced a "wave" model in which linguistic changes spared like waves, leading ultimately to convergence; that is, growing similarity among languages that were initially quite different.

  Today, however, most linguists think primarily in terms of linguistic family trees. It is necessary to construct some explicit models of how language change might occur according to a process-based view. There are four main classes of models.

  The first is the process of initial colonization, by which an uninhabited territory becomes populated; its language naturally becomes that of the colonizers. Second are processes of divergence, such as the linguistic divergence arising form separation or isolation mentioned above in relation to early models of the Indo-European languages. The third group of models is based on processes of linguistic convergence. The wave model, formulated by Schmidt in the 1870's, is an example, but convergence methods have not generally found favour among linguists.

  Now, the slow and rather static operation of these processes is complicated by another factor: linguistic replacement. That factor provides the basis for a fourth class of models. In many areas of the world the languages initially spoken by the indigenous people have come to be replaced, fully or partially, by languages spoken by people coming from outside. Were it not for this large complicating factor, the world's linguistic history could be faithfully described by the initial distribution of Homo Sapiens, followed by the gradual, ling-term workings of divergence and convergence. So linguistic replacement also has a key role to play in explaining the origins of the Indo-European languages.

  Questions 26-32

  Below is a summary of part of Reading Passage 3,"The Origins of Indo-European Languages".

  Read the summary and then select the best word or phrase from the box below to fill each gap. according to the information in the Reading Passage. Write the corresponding letters (A-L) in boxes 26-32 on your answer sheet.

  N.B. There are more words and phrases than you will need to fill the gaps. You may use a word or phrase more than once if you wish.

  Summary-Models of Language Change

  Answer

  Example There are four main models of language …… (Ex) …… K

  The first is the process of initial colonization where an uninhabited territory becomes populated: the language spoken will therefore be that of the ……(26)……

  Processes of ……(27)…… occur where different dialects, and then languages, develop from a common ……(28)…… Many of the original characteristics of this common ancestor can be reconstructed from what we know of the present separate ……(29)……

  Processes of linguistic ……(30)…… occur when languages which were initially different become more similar through contact. The wave model, formulated by Schmidt in the 1870s, is an example.

  The final model is that of linguistic ……(31)…… In this model, a new language replaces the language spoken by the ……(32)……

  A colonizers G languages

  B invaders H waves

  C proto-language I replacement

  D indigenous people J convergence

  E linguists K development

  F model L divergence

一键复制全文